BAD ATTACKER, GOOD ATTACKER….????
It seems
that most traditional martial arts teach defenses which are predicated on
specific types of attacks. This likely
comes from the eras long ago where everyone involved in a conflict was trained
essentially the same way. For example,
the vast majority of martial arts teach straight line reverse and/or lunge
punches aimed at the defender’s face and then teach defenses against
these.
With weapons
attacks we are typically taught to defend from a particular type of style of
attack as well.
Since we
know from the outset what the attack is likely to consist of, with a little
training the defense is relatively easy, even when the intensity of the attack
is increased.
More often
than not, when the attacker (in class) inadvertently or deliberately changes
the method of attack the defender tends to ask the attacker to start over and
“do it right” or he ends up failing to effectively defend the “unorthodox
attack”. Herein lies the origin of the
term “bad attacker”.
Moshe Katz,
founder and head instructor of Israeli Krav International once said “There are
no bad attackers……There are only bad defenses.”.
This brings
me to the point where I would like to share my personal observations based on
over two decades of training and well over one decade of teaching. As a matter of clarification, these
observations are related strictly to real world self defense (on the street, in
your home, etc.) and not to training under controlled, monitored conditions in
the dojo or dojang. In our world of IKI
Krav Maga we never tell anyone how they should attack and that makes things
beyond interesting at times, especially since the instructor (in this case that
would be me) never knows quite what to expect, especially when demonstrating a technique…..
Punch
Attacks: On the street it is much more likely that you will see a circular type
punch than a straight punch. The
circular punch can be anything from a ‘haymaker’ to a type of hook to an
uppercut. Straight punches in a street
situation are usually from someone who has a bit of boxing or traditional
martial arts training. The boxer will
likely throw a jab first and the traditional martial artist will use more of a
power punch, straight for the face or, less frequently, at the body. The point here is that you just don’t know in
advance and knowing ahead of time that you don’t or won’t know is really
important information to have.
Additionally we see people stepping into the punch with the same foot as
the punching hand, others stepping with the opposite foot and some not stepping
at all. While your training may tell you
that all but one of these is a bad attacker, if you haven’t trained to expect
the unexpected you are likely going to get hit and you may not know why until
much later. Another important aspect of
this scenario is that you will more than likely not know initially whether the
attacker is right or left handed.
Consequently we advocate training for the
unexpected and we let the attacker do whatever is natural to him or her in the
process. Makes for some close calls
occasionally but doing this teaches you to be very aware of what is going on
and to scan (with your peripheral vision) for “tells” or telegraphing of the
punch. “Tells” will always occur with a
power punch. With a jab or “sucker
punch” the “tells” are extremely difficult to read but you can often ‘read’ the
attacker’s attitude before he/she strikes.
One of the
ironies here is that if you decide to purely defend (i.e., back up and block
the punch) you may or may not end up in the right position to do so. Conversely, if you opt to defend by attacking
the person punching (i.e., moving into him/her and using a hard strike attack
as your block) the type of punch and/or footwork involved doesn’t really much
matter. There are a few exceptions, of
course, but we’ll address those at another time.
Weapons
attacks: The same situation occurs when
someone is trying to strike with a hard, blunt weapon or cut you with an edged
weapon. If you know in advance how or if
the attacker will step and/or in what direction he/she will swing the attacking
weapon defending is relatively easy (with training). On the other hand, if you do not know these
things in advance, much can go wrong and usually does. Our tendency is to step back and execute a
defensive technique or move but not knowing which (if any) foot will be
stepping and/or how far and/or in what direction makes our defensive move more
difficult. Again, if we attack the
attacker by moving instantly into him and striking with force (preferably in
two locations simultaneously) this will disrupt his/her game plan drastically
and put us in control from that moment forward.
Indeed this
is all counter intuitive but that is the beauty of it. No matter how smart an attacker is or is not,
he/she subconsciously expects certain things to happen when the attack is
initiated. Once you do something that
overtly conflicts with those expectations the attacker has to essentially
“reboot” and figure out how to deal with what he never imagined would happen.
Hal Herndon 2013
Hal Herndon 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment